Philosophy of The Revolutionary Diet

Nearly everyone is looking for the best diet plan to help them with weight loss or weight management. They're constantly buying books and magazines that tout the latest weight loss diet and teach them how to diet. They spend hundreds of dollars on healthy eating guides and meal plans that don't work (or work for a few weeks).

Meanwhile, the answer is right there in history - just live the way Americans did at the time of the American Revolution.

Paul Revere, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and the rest didn't sit in front of the television stuffing their mouths with Doritos and swilling Diet Coke from 64 oz. buckets. They ate real food, worked outside in the fresh air and sunshine, and got plenty of sleep.

Regardless of your diet goals, you can enjoy the benefits of healthy living without starving yourself and without suffering. Oh yeah, it's not that hard. Just eat real food and get some exercise. You'll be amazed at how quickly you get great results, how good you feel, and how good you look. And all without the pain and sacrifice that you experienced with diets in the past.

Pages

What the Colonial Virginians Ate

From The Shiksa.com:


The first colonial settlers came to America for a variety of reasons… money, religious freedom, a new beginning. All undoubtedly had dreams of finding a better life in the New World. It was the birth of our nation, and also the birth of American cuisine.
In 1607 the first British colony—Virginia—was established, and 1776 was the year the Declaration of Independence was signed. This span of years is known as the Colonial Period. It was during this time that large numbers of European settlers began to arrive in the U.S., colonizing along the east coast of North America. There were many different cultural influences in America at the time, including settlers from Britain, Sweden, the Netherlands, France, Germany, slaves from Africa, and Native American tribes. This melding pot of humanity resulted in many diverse approaches to food. To find some perspective in what would otherwise be a massive subject, today I am focusing specifically on the Colony of Virginia, one of the thirteen original British colonies.
Why Virginia? I’m glad you asked!
You all know that I’ve been researching my ancestry. Well, it turns out there is yet another fascinating character in my family tree. In my What the Tudors Ate blog, I wrote about my ancestor Sir Thomas Wyatt, a poet in King Henry VIII’s court. It turns out that Wyatt’s offspring did some pretty interesting things, too. He had a son, known as Thomas Wyatt the younger, who led a rebellion against Queen Mary I (the daughter of Henry VIII and heir to his throne).
Thomas the younger, it is written, had a “wild disposition” and a deep hatred for Spain. When Queen Mary was betrothed to Philip of Spain, Thomas conspired against the marriage, believing that Mary’s younger sister Elizabeth should be on the throne instead. He led a rebellion of 4,000 men who marched on London, but his rebel army deserted him at the last minute, and he was forced to surrender. He was later tried, found guilty of treason, beheaded and quartered as ordered by Queen Mary, aka “Bloody Mary.”
Shivers.
This might well have been the end of the Wyatt family (which means I would have never been born!), but as luck would have it Thomas the younger gave birth to a son before he was executed. That son, George Wyatt, and his wife gave birth to two sons—Reverend Haute Wyatt (1594-1638) and Sir Francis Wyatt (1588-1644). Those two brothers, Francis and Haute, arrived in America on August 1, 1621 aboard a ship called the George. Shortly thereafter, Sir Francis became the first English crown governor of the Colony of Virginia in 1621. He also introduced the first written constitution for an English colony. This constitution became a model for all later forms of government in the American colonies.
Wow, right? Just, wow! My ancestor was the first royal governor of Virginia. I’m a direct descendent of Francis’ brother, Reverend Haute. It’s so cool to know that I have a colonial governor in my family tree! The state of Virginia has a special place in my heart… I’ve dreamed of having a farm in Virginia for as long as I can remember. I took my first trip there in 2008, and went back again in 2009 because I loved it so much. This was all before I knew about Sir Francis and Reverend Haute. Virginia must be in my genes. So cool!
Okay, back to food history. The Colony of Virginia was actually the first permanent English colony in North America, founded at the settlement of Jamestown in 1607. The first decade of colonial life was fraught with hardship as settlers learned to live in this strange New World. European crops would not grow, provisions were poor, and settlers did not know how to fend for themselves in this harsh, uncharted land. Over time, the new Americans learned from the Native Americans, adopting native crops like maize (corn), beans, squash, cranberries, sunflower seeds, and chestnuts. Wild-growing foods were also gathered and consumed, including berries, grapes, onions and plums. As decades passed, European crops were imported and successfully cultivated in America, including rye, wheat, oats, cabbage, peas, carrots and beets. Orchard fruits flourished in the New World, particularly apples. Apples were eaten fresh, baked into pies and tarts, dried, or fermented into alcohol (“apple jack”—aka apple brandy).
In the early colonial period, settlers relied on fish and wild game (deer, buffalo, wild fowl) to sustain them. Fish from rivers and shellfish from the coast provided an abundant source of protein. As farms were established, cattle were imported and poultry was domesticated. But the most widely consumed meat animal was the pig. Pigs thrived in the South, and were particularly useful to the settlers because their meat was easy to salt and preserve. Lard was often used as a cooking fat. As colonists grew their domesticated animal herds, dairy farming became more popular. Cheese, butter, and eggs became staples of the colonial diet.
Virginia, a plantation colony, has an unfortunate history of slave trade. African slaves made a major contribution to the Southern colonial diet. Slaves were often permitted to grow their own gardens to supplement their food rations. In these gardens they cultivated a variety of then unfamiliar foods, including yams, okra, peanuts, melons and sesame seeds. These foods were adopted by the mainstream, and quickly became popular throughout the American South.
In the colonies, three meals were served per day—breakfast in the morning, dinner mid-day (the most substantial meal), and a light supper in the evening. Of course, different income brackets enjoyed different types of food depending on what they could afford. The diet of Governor Francis Wyatt would have been quite different from the poorer colonial settlers and slaves. But even the wealthy and well-established had to plan their meals around what was readily available to the colonies. Very few food items were imported, particularly in the early colonial period.
The best descriptions I’ve found about colonial eating appear in a book published in 1975 called A Cooking Legacy by Virginia T. Elverson and Mary Ann McLanahan.

BREAKFAST
In frontier outposts and on farms, families drank cider or beer and gulped down a bowl of porridge that had been cooking slowly all night over the embers… The southern poor ate cold turkey washed down with ever-present cider. The size of breakfasts grew in direct proportion to growth of wealth… It was among the Southern planters that breakfast became a leisurely and delightful meal, though it was not served until early chores were attended to and orders for the day given… Breads were eaten at all times of the day, but particularly at breakfast.
DINNER
Early afternoon was the appointed hour for dinner in Colonial America. Throughout the seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century it was served in the “hall” or “common room.” While dinner among the affluent merchants in the North took place shortly after noon, the Southern planters enjoyed their dinner late as bubbling stews were carried into the fields to feed the slaves and laborers… In the early settlements, poor families ate from trenchers filled from a common stew pot, with a bowl of coarse salt the only table adornment… The stews often included pork, sweet corn and cabbage, or other vegetables and roots which were available…
SUPPER
…supper was a brief meal and, especially in the South, light and late. It generally consisted of leftovers from dinner… In the richer merchant society and in Southern plantation life, eggs and egg dishes were special delicacies and were prepared as side dishes at either dinner or supper.

Speaking of eggs and egg dishes, how about we take a taste of colonial life by preparing an Apple Tansey! This historical recipe appears in The Compleat Housewife: Or, Accomplished Gentelwoman’s Companion, a cookbook written by Eliza Smith, originally published in 1742. Though the book was published in London, it was later reprinted and published in Williamsburgh, Virginia by the printer William Parks. It is the first cookbook ever to be published in the United States.

Low carbs - my own experience

Carbohydrates are a four-letter word in many dieting circles.  I used to think that sugars gave grains a bad name, but am refining my belief after some recent reading (much of it documented in this blog), and my own personal experience.

True, sugars are to be limited severely.  Simple sugars (like sucrose) and high-fructose corn syrup should be avoided as much as possible.  If you like a little sweetener in your tea or coffee, use honey (as your ancestors did). 

But what about grains?  When I was married, my wife was in remission from Hodgkin's disease, and I learned to cook macrobiotic for her.  The basis of the macrobiotic diet was grains (mostly brown rice) and beans.  Many grains are good for you, but if you're looking for a rule of thumb, consider the degree of processing they've undergone.  Oats in oatmeal are good.  Wheat in pasta or bread is bad.  Brown rice or barley, when eaten in their barely refined form are good.  White rice and most corn products are bad (much of today's corn is GM - or genetically modified, and the effects such modification has on your health is not well known; the modifications were designed to make the crops yield more and be resistant to pests; since pests have much the same biology as you do, I'm very suspicious of GM crops).

Many beans are high in carbohydrates, but they're also low in fat, high in protein and fiber.  I recommend beans as a substitute for meat if you're trying to eat less meat (to lower your cholesterol, save money, or reduce your carbon footprint - yes, a vegetarian diet is better for the planet too).

My experience?  Yes, I began to digress.  At the start of this year (nearly three months ago), because of an article I shared with you, I slashed my intake of bread and pasta.  The two used to be staples in my diet.  Instead of a sandwich for lunch, I wrap meat and cheese in romaine lettuce or layer it on green pepper slices.  It adds a little to my lunch budget, but is very tasty, and better for me.  For dinner, instead of pasta, I'm making mostly meat and veggies (broiled chicken and fish, eaten next to my veggies cut up and mixed in with them in a lettuce-free "salad" are the most common meals).  Immediately I saw a decline in my weight. 

Normally I gain weight in winter and lose weight in summer.  My goal each winter is to gain less than I lost the previous summer, whereas my goal in the summer is to lose more than I gained the previous winter.  Needless to say, as I've gotten older (just turned fifty at the end of last year), my metabolism slows and achieving those goals is more difficult.

So the fact that I lost weight in winter was very encouraging to me.  Coupled with my increased physical activity level in the summer, I expect this new diet (and I want to stress that this is diet with a lower case "d," in that I expect to remain on this forever, as opposed to Diet with an upper case "D" that is something people adopt for a short period of time to lose weight quickly) to yield great results.

Now, in the interest of full disclosure and honesty, I have to say that while I lost seven pounds the first month of my new eating discipline (much better than the word diet), my weight has remained at that level since then.  I attribute this to complacency (so happy with my new success, I allowed myself a few more snacks - mostly mixed nuts - than I ought to have been eating), and believe that it ought not to be hard to get serious again and see another weight drop.  The fact that I didn't gain weight this winter, and will even end winter at a lower weight than I began it, means that I'm well-positioned for a very fit summer.

Oh yeah, there's that word "fit."  Fitness is more than weight.  Far more.  In fact, I used to think I was both fit and fat.  My strength and endurance were more than up to the task of any activity in which I chose to engage (mostly hiking, biking, and snowshoeing), but I carried some extra weight, so I didn't look as good as I felt.  The new slimmer me ought to change all of that.  Also, if I have less weight to carry around, then I ought to be able to hike longer and farther this summer.  Heck, merely dropping twenty pounds is like the difference between hiking with a pack and without one!

Stay tuned to the Revolutionary Diet blog to see how my progress goes.

How the Paleolithic Diet Compares to What Modern Americans Eat

I'm no scientist, so I can't say whether or not our bodies have evolved as fast as our diet, but I suspect not.  I know that eating all the garbage (trans fats, high fructose corn syrup, etc.) that's in fake foods is bad for you.  While I certainly don't advocate eating like our cavemen ancestors, there's a lot to be said for a diet that is weighted more towards the real foods that could be hunted or scavenged, and less on processed (and overly processed) foods that dominate the supermarket shelves and the diets of many Americans.

From Good:

This chart presents another way of looking into the diet of our evolutionary ancestors by comparing one researcher's understanding of the Paleolithic diet with the diet of the diet of 20th century Americans. As I pointed out in this post, there's still considerable debate about the merits of a Paleolithic diet and its implications in the modern diseases of affluence.
Is the diet of our evolutionary ancestors a good place to start looking for a model diet and lifestyle? Weigh in on the discussion here.
Chart via Jew, "Evolution of the Human Diet," Journal of Medicinal Food, 2009, using data from Eaton and Cordain, "Paleolithic nutrition revisited," Nature, 1997, and Hiza and Bente "Nutrient Content of the U.S. Food Supply. 1909-2004," USDA, 2007.